The bronze medal status of gymnast Jordan Chiles in a women’s floor final event has become uncertain. The Romanian Olympic and Sports Committee filed a complaint to the International Gymnastics Federation after Jordan was awarded the bronze medal. They raised concerns about the validity of the score inquiry submitted by Jordan’s coach, which was determined to be late by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

As a result, the initial score of 13.666 was deemed invalid, leading to an emotional and controversial turn of events. The aftermath of these developments has seen strong reactions from various parties. The USAG expressed disappointment in the CAS ruling and condemned the hurtful attacks on Jordan on social media.

Jordan faced cruel and derogatory comments, with some accusing her of cheating and questioning her entitlement to the bronze medal. The sequence of events and the subsequent ruling also impacted Ana, who initially celebrated what she believed was a victory but was ultimately displaced by Jordan as the bronze medalist. Additionally, Cecile, Jordan’s coach, explained the rationale behind the score inquiry and the decision-making process during the floor finals.

Subsequent announcements by USAG and USOPC hinted at attempts to challenge the CAS ruling with video evidence and appeals, but it appeared likely that Jordan would have to return the bronze medal. Meanwhile, an emotional reaction from Jordan led to her decision to take a break from social media, while Ana extended supportive words to her teammates, expressing her hope for all three of them to share the same podium at the next Olympics. These events have sparked controversy, emotional turmoil, and a strong response from the involved parties, shedding light on the complexities and tensions within the gymnastics world.